Like what? most of opera features are hardly improved after being introduced, some are the same like in version 7! most are from version 8.
Instead of focusing on experience, they focus on a stupid timeline. Unless it was x.0.1 release.ĭon’t get me wrong, I love Opera, but their “push, push, push” strategy in incredibly ridiculous. Why Opera struggles with the market share (please note: it still grows)? New user downloads browser, tries it, experiences crashes and switches to its competitor, leaving behind bad Opera memories, browser, he/she won’t be trying for a long time to come. What’s the issue there? Imagine novice PC user downloading Opera (by randomly selecting it) and experiencing all those crashes. However, the number one thing which annoys me is: they rushed it due to ballot screen.
More = better? Not really, when you release 2 RC builds on the same day. I don’t even know, on how many RC (release candidate) builds there have been. Over the past week, browser was constantly crashing on specific sites, or just randomly, for instance, when watching videos from, etc. However, when it comes to releasing Final builds (major release), it’s usually the same story.
Opera neon unstable software#
One of the things I adore about Opera Software are their innovations. Well, why not give it a try? After using Opera for about a week (~12 hours/day), I come up to the following conclusion: it was rushed, yet again. Just before Opera 10.50 Final release, BetaNews has published an article called “ Is Opera 10.5 ready for the March 1 ‘choice screen?’” which provides some great points (thanks to nobody for link).
0 kommentar(er)
